menu
Downloads Servers Forums Support
Home› General Discussion

Hot or Not?

keenkeen
edited November 2009 in General Discussion
He keeps blaming me for someone finding his glaringly obvious vulnerabilities when I had no idea he even started new stuff (until coming to the forums anyway). So, this time I actually will start something against you, Phantom :p I will let you guys decide. FOR ME TO POOP ON!!

n100000295845978_9089.jpg
«13

Comments

  • JJasio
    Lesbian.
  • DudeBotDudeBot
    mods are asleep, post some cp
    wait, this is tribesnext
  • KKryand
    WTF who puts two questions that have different answers at the top of one thread.
  • keenkeen
    Kryand
    WTF who puts two questions that have different answers at the top of one thread.

    It would be Ill-Logical not to.

    snrk
  • Oni LinkOni Link
    Chances are this is against the law, BUT YESS.
  • HHumans
    I'd hit that.
  • DudeBotDudeBot
    Wait............... is that a red snuggy?
  • Oni LinkOni Link
    DudeBot
    Wait............... is that a red snuggy?
    ......dear....god....
  • MMruballos
    Cute.
  • Phantom139Phantom139
    Awww the retard has my picture that is on a public site, how cute that everyone thinks it's a big deal.
  • BlnukemBlnukem
    Clearly a lesbian. :P
  • DudeBotDudeBot
    This thread has given me an erection

    triumph01.jpg
    FOR ME TO POOP ON
  • VashTexanVashTexan
    Holy mother of yogurt! That's a guy!? That's one hell of a disguise! No facial hair, round feminine face, purple and violet coat, and a rat dog that so many air head girls somehow love (like pet, like owner). Now all you need to do is learn how to Free Run, creep quietly, use ninja swords, and throw ninja stars and you'd be an honorary ninja! (I omitted the ability to entertain a room full of drunken men because you seem to have the trained and expertise skills for that from just looking at that picture.)

    And that's discrimination against lesbians! ... Not that I'm for or against, just matter of fact...

    And who voted no 3 times!? I think he cheated with 2 extra accounts!
  • KKryand
    Don't forget the fact that he thinks Charmed is a good show.
  • Phantom139Phantom139
    edited November 2009
    Oni
    Chances are this is against the law, BUT YESS.

    That does remind me of the libel law. I'll just keep that handy in case keen thinks he has anything over me with my pictures, or does indeed try to quote "Start Something".

    And judging by the poll name, I'd say I'd have a pretty damn good case against keen were I to choose to do so.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation
  • keenkeen
    You're going to sue me for Defamation? Ok sure!

    My IP is: 127.0.0.1 - Address is 31 Spooner Street, Quahog, RI
    Come and get me girly!
  • Phantom139Phantom139
    edited November 2009
    keen
    You're going to sue me for Defamation? Ok sure!

    My IP is: 127.0.0.1 - Address is 31 Spooner Street, Quahog, RI
    Come and get me girly!

    Or I could contact your ISP and have them call your local authorities to take you to court where I may do so.

    You publish defamitory articles, you take a risk, you publish them against me, I push the envelope.

    EDIT:

    By the way, thank you for providing me with all the evidence and witnesses I need.
  • kamishizukakamishizuka
    Phantom139
    That does remind me of the libel law.
    Wikipedia -
    Another important aspect of defamation is the difference between fact and opinion. Statements made as "facts" are frequently actionable defamation. Statements of opinion or pure opinion are not actionable. In order to win damages in a libel case, the plaintiff must first show that the statements were "statements of fact or mixed statements of opinion and fact" and second that these statements were false.

    In order for defamation to have standing in court, the statements must be a) false, b) knowingly presented as facts with intent to defame, and c) there must be a concrete, not hypothetical, injury to the complainant; i.e. Phantom loses something because keen et al think his picture is girly. Since I see failing at b and c, your case wouldn't have standing, and would probably be thrown out before you finished filing it.

    Not to mention you're talking legal fees if you're honestly considering calling for a defamation suit. And seriously, you're going to sue someone over comments made on an internet forum for a game that's nearly ten years old?
  • Phantom139Phantom139
    Shizuka
    Phantom139
    That does remind me of the libel law.
    Wikipedia -
    Another important aspect of defamation is the difference between fact and opinion. Statements made as "facts" are frequently actionable defamation. Statements of opinion or pure opinion are not actionable. In order to win damages in a libel case, the plaintiff must first show that the statements were "statements of fact or mixed statements of opinion and fact" and second that these statements were false.

    In order for defamation to have standing in court, the statements must be a) false, b) knowingly presented as facts with intent to defame, and c) there must be a concrete injury to the complainant; i.e. Phantom loses something because keen et al think his picture is girly. Since I see failing at b and c, your case wouldn't have standing, and would probably be thrown out before you finished filing it.

    Not to mention you're talking legal fees if you're honestly considering calling for a defamation suit. And seriously, you're going to sue someone over comments made on an internet forum for a game that's nearly ten years old?

    Better to set an example than to have assholes ruining my name in the game development community.

    and, you're wrong

    b) he clearly posted the poll title in an attempt to defame
    c) my name in the community.

    trust me, I learned this shit in both journalism and government class.
  • kamishizukakamishizuka
    Poll -
    Robert Fritzen looks like a girl, do you agree?
    The "do you agree" bit indicates opinion. Ergo not fact, ergo not defamation. Quod erat demonstrandum.

    And I'd like to see a court that would take a case to defend someone's name in a video game... get real.
  • keenkeen
    Phantom139
    keen
    You're going to sue me for Defamation? Ok sure!

    My IP is: 127.0.0.1 - Address is 31 Spooner Street, Quahog, RI
    Come and get me girly!

    Or I could contact your ISP and have them call your local authorities to take you to court where I may do so.

    You publish defamitory articles, you take a risk, you publish them against me, I push the envelope.

    EDIT:

    By the way, thank you for providing me with all the evidence and witnesses I need.

    Oh snap, she's going to get me.. in court! I'm pretty sure making a porno in court is illegal. Are you ready for that, little girl?
  • KKryand
    What would Cole Turner do!?!
  • Phantom139Phantom139
    Shizuka
    Poll -
    Robert Fritzen looks like a girl, do you agree?
    The "do you agree" bit indicates opinion. Ergo not fact, ergo not defamation. Quod erat demonstrandum.

    And I'd like to see a court that would take a case to defend someone's name in a video game... get real.
    Dark Dragon DX -
    Legally, you can sue for multiple reasons (should shut others up too).

    DX Agrees with me.

    Not to mention I live next to lawyers, one of them was my journalism teacher who clearly explained that falsly declaring an individual as the opposite sex to defamate is a libel crime.
  • keenkeen
    I'm like Agent Smith. You think you've found me, but you haven't. You go to find me but I'm just a random passerby. You have a lot to learn, and someone has to knock you off your high horse. That person is not me, believe it or not. I'm just having fun picking on someone clearly too oblivious and retarded to really see what's going on. Or to code for that matter. Or...

    triumph_head.jpg
    FOR ME TO POOP ON!
  • JJasio
    I'm not sure same sex marriage is allowed in your State -- are those dogs parents aware of your intimate relationship?
  • kamishizukakamishizuka
    Wikipedia, -
    Another important aspect of defamation is the difference between fact and opinion. Statements made as "facts" are frequently actionable defamation. Statements of opinion or pure opinion are not actionable. In order to win damages in a libel case, the plaintiff must first show that the statements were "statements of fact or mixed statements of opinion and fact" and second that these statements were false.

    I point you again to the poll prompt.
    Poll -
    Robert Fritzen looks like a girl, do you agree?

    I do believe you, like a lot of people on the internet, are failing to grasp the crucial difference between a fact and an opinion.
    Not to mention I live next to lawyers, one of them was my journalism teacher who clearly explained that falsly declaring an individual as the opposite sex to defamate is a libel crime.
    a) somehow I get the feeling they won't work pro bono for your destined-to-fail-spectactularly case, and
    b) by leaving out the crucial with intent to defame, not to mention the requirement of a non-abstract injury by the Supreme Court of the United States (please see Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992)), you've helped suggest that the teacher has no idea what they're talking about.
  • DudeBotDudeBot
    Phantom139
    Shizuka
    Poll -
    Robert Fritzen looks like a girl, do you agree?
    The "do you agree" bit indicates opinion. Ergo not fact, ergo not defamation. Quod erat demonstrandum.

    And I'd like to see a court that would take a case to defend someone's name in a video game... get real.
    Dark Dragon DX -
    Legally, you can sue for multiple reasons (should shut others up too).


    DX Agrees with me.

    Not to mention I live next to lawyers, one of them was my journalism teacher who clearly explained that falsly declaring an individual as the opposite sex to defamate is a libel crime.


    Did you seriously just take legal advice from a high school teacher and DX?
    Go read some USC and come back.
    http://uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml
  • Phantom139Phantom139
    Shizuka
    Wikipedia, -
    Another important aspect of defamation is the difference between fact and opinion. Statements made as "facts" are frequently actionable defamation. Statements of opinion or pure opinion are not actionable. In order to win damages in a libel case, the plaintiff must first show that the statements were "statements of fact or mixed statements of opinion and fact" and second that these statements were false.

    I point you again to the poll prompt.
    Poll -
    Robert Fritzen looks like a girl, do you agree?

    I do believe you, like a lot of people on the internet, are failing to grasp the crucial difference between a fact and an opinion.
    Not to mention I live next to lawyers, one of them was my journalism teacher who clearly explained that falsly declaring an individual as the opposite sex to defamate is a libel crime.
    a) somehow I get the feeling they won't work pro bono for your destined-to-fail-spectactularly case, and
    b) by leaving out the crucial with intent to defame, not to mention the requirement of a non-abstract injury by the Supreme Court of the United States (please see Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife (1992)), you've helped suggest that the teacher has no idea what they're talking about.

    the teacher explained that, it's not the teacher who doesn't have any idea what they're talking about.

    Unlike other people, I can actually admit when I'm wrong here, and it would clearly appear to be an ergo here as a poll.

    You win this round keen, just be damn lucky that you had those two words 'Who Thinks' in there.

    Because a group of people were definitely prepared to back me up here.
  • TurkehTurkeh
    Phantom139
    You win this round keen, just be damn lucky that you had those two words 'Who Thinks' in there.

    Because a group of people were definitely prepared to back me up here.
    Your parents don't count.
  • CCorrosion
    Crowd_Of_People_That_Care.jpg
This discussion has been closed.